Wednesday, November 28, 2012

The Next New Thing

Of all the "new" media forms discussed on this blog and many more found in the wider society, the most fascinating type is the kind which does not yet exist.  What would it look like?  What would it do?  I'd think the answer is relative.  One approach to the possibilities would be a consideration of what society needs now and in the future.  More than ever, new media tends to be fluid and impactful, yet traditional.  We may begin our news search in the morning browsing curators like bloggers and share stories on Facebook, for instance, however these must be verifiable and so we tend to rely on the legacy media (ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN) for the "true" version of events.  In this way, any new media has to be trusted.  

Moreover, any new media would need to be social.  First responders after hurricane Sandy, for example, were regular people organizing on Facebook to get the victims toward food and shelter (for maybe the first time, the Red Cross played a supporting role). Whatever the new media is to become, it will probably not thrive without speedy agreement from thousands of ardent supporters.  Third, we live in a society of images and so the new media will have to be visual.  The advertising industry best understands this concept.  

Fortunately, maybe (it depends upon how you see it), the internet has seized and transformed almost every industry.  If it hasn't reached yours yet, it soon will.  It would be great if a new media form could truly make the world closer in alignment with what we believe it could be.  Save the animals? Sure. Cure for Cancer? Coming right up. Fries with that? The best ever.  IT is discouraging however to know that the same nature of the world that encourages such invention will also become its downfall.  Great ideas can be known, shared, and built upon, but people rarely get to really experience the benefits for long before huge regulations are imposed. We seem to see the future world, but we cannot yet really live there.  Any awe inspiring new media will have to be allowed to continue without harsh restraint and for a sufficient period of time. 

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Privacy and Confidentiality

Online privacy. The term is redundant.  New ways of sharing media, first via usenet and formal blogs then later social networks, have made it impossible to remain an enigma online.  Oh sure, one wonders, if I haven't done anything wrong, what would I have to hide?  Anything a person does could seem controversial to another as a consequence of living in a networked world.  Personalities and cultures, for example often come into conflict.  Looking to become an employee of X company?  Better be able to fit into the culture.  This means keeping under wraps your photos of last Saturday's wild evening, or other information you wouldn't want to share with everyone.  But how?  Facebook seems to offer privacy features, but eventually allows your info to become public.  Twitter and blogs can be hacked.  Official government memos could be leaked.  The relative comfort of life behind a screen is illusory; don't mention anything you wouldn't want everyone to know.  The consequences could get you fired, arrested, stalked, or worse.  Alternately, the lack of privacy gives new meaning to the phrase "paper trail"; look out online bullies, your actions are being documented.  Similarly criminals hiding out on social networks could be caught more easily than, say, hunkering down in the old safe house.             

According to Wikipedia, privacy is a condition of being selectively compartmentalized, anonymous, the decision to remain unidentified.  This sounds great when wishing to assume new identities or attempting to become more social in group settings.  The ability to hide creates a certain courage, but at what cost?  Many would argue that online socializing is not as beneficial as the real thing.  People become even more isolated as a result.  Studies show that the animal brain requires challenges when growing new neurons-the lack of real interaction could literally cause brain drain.

Confidentiality seems work in the opposite manner; access is granted to a select few relevant parties.  Lack of confidentiality may cause clients to cease sharing useful information with their lawyers, derailing precedent setting court cases.  Victims of a crime may not be as forthcoming if real identities are revealed.  Patients may not volunteer embarrassing symptoms if this were to become public.  Companies could not function if top secret details were to be published.  The "need to know" basis,however,  has all but disappeared.  More than ever, people simply have to trust one another to use discretion.  In the future, we will not be able to continue as a society if we cannot trust someone with our most private information.      

Monday, November 26, 2012

P2P File sharing

File sharing is the act of downloading information in media form such as movies, music, ebooks, documents, or anything online.  File sharing at this point is intrinsic to the internet; how else would ideas truly grow and evolve? Clive Thomson notes that file sharing is changing entire industries.  He points out that television shows that formerly cost hundreds of thousands of dollars can now be produced digitally at home and shared at a fraction of this cost, replacing the standard format.  Some people believe that this ability to act collaboratively should be an inalienable human right, while others label this an act of piracy.  True, artists must be compensated for their work, but are billions of dollars more important than the drive to create and conceptualize? The answer will depend upon whom you ask.  

The advent of P2P, or peer to peer, file sharing makes it easier than ever to gain access to the goods.  Here computers can communicate and files are subsequently copied from one system to another.  Last week's popular movie can now be viewed at home, for free and shared among many users.  Ever since Napster lead the way with downloading music from the personal collection of friends and strangers, the world has become embroiled in an interesting legal and ethical dilemma.  Precious privacy and confidentiality, for example, mentioned in the previous post, could become compromised.  Sensitive military and commercial documents may put lives and careers in danger.  Previously solid moral grounds become grey areas when individuals do not pay for the privilege of ownership.  Unfortunately, dire consequences are becoming business as usual in a connected world; it's common to pay thousands for a few illegally acquired songs.  Maybe this will be the inspiration to create a balance (make the punishment fit the crime) and thus inspire new business models.  In any case, traditional medial outlets will need to adapt if they expect to survive.          

Friday, November 9, 2012

Creativity and New Media





My definition of creativity and new media.  The title is "A Job A Day".  Sometimes my creativity comes from experiences and so this depicts various places I've worked for over the years.  After much saving of money, I am here (thankfully) back in school. Last semester, yay. 

First, I have assembled YouTube videos dealing with different types of employment that were then edited in Final Cut Pro.  Layered over these are images of storefronts cut and (painstakingly) altered in Photoshop.  AfterEffects finishes the job with an animated figure walking by to show the passage of time.  The music reflect the mood.  The video was shared on YouTube and now appears on this blog.

Creativity



So how does new media foster creativity?  Put simply, new media makes it easy to develop new compositions.  Being creative in this sense is quick and inexpensive.  Making a new mashup, for example, merely combines work from different sources to bring forth new meaning to the pieces.  According Frere-Jones, anyone with a computer and the right software can create a new work with little effort.  Further, the idea does not just sit on the shelves of a library or record store.  Sites like Vimeo and YouTube allow creators and users to share the product, which may go viral as a result.  New viewers may then gain inspiration from these and subsequently create their own work.  

Companies have found new media to be cost effective when designing new products. Leaders like Lego and Twitter, for instance, use social platforms to let average people submit their designs.  This is creative outsourcing at its best, yet the negative aspects are still being worked out.  

Copyright matters, royalty agreements, and "what is art" aesthetics are called into question when everyone (and anyone) holds the key to the means of production.  It is curious that these worries do not restrict the desire or ability to create new work, as they tend to in the offline world.  Maybe it is the legal grey area fostered by new media that allows the creativity to continue. 

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Modeling Reality with Virtual Worlds

-->

Virtual worlds are evolving all the time.  They can be used for entertainment (video games), business (corporate meetings), or political aims (info gatherings). Here we can view spaces and items which may or may not exist in the real world.  In these ways virtual worlds can be fun, informative, and creative.  Virtual worlds are fraught with pros and cons.  Users with disabilities such as autism, for example, can benefit from experiencing social settings in different ways.  Architects and designers can view and present their creations clearly.  Historic places in danger of slipping away can be preserved forever.  Want to see the Mona Lisa? You can view it any time you like from the comfort of your own home.  However, I feel that many of these possibilities are marred by their shortcomings.  I'd prefer to see the real thing.  Also, personal safety might be an issue; children in Second Life might become acquainted with dangerous "people".  Personal information may be exposed-even Twitter isn't safe from hackers.  If you are at a club, you cannot have a beer with that.  Maybe these issues could be solved with some further technical development. 

It's easy to be creative in virtual reality.  You can choose any type avatar you like with the right clothes and hair.  You can choose a location template or create your own world.  You can make music or create a painting of your own.  Feel free to design a dress, make a new color, or present your own dream home.  Personally the most wonderful thing about virtual reality is that the options prompt people to think about their lives, for better or for worse, and what they'd really like versus what they expect to achieve.  People could make many of their goals actual realities instead of virtual ones if they only knew what it was they really wanted. For this, future virtual realities may evolve into a training ground for future exploration.  Users could try on a career or visit a country to find if this is something they'd want to really do in the real future.  As usual, there would also be business implications. Marketing companies would gladly pay for the opportunity to decipher the product preferences of various demographic groups.  I'm watching this to see how it all turns out.         

 

Monday, October 29, 2012

Bibliography


Work Cited

Cohen, David. “96% of Small Businesses Are on Facebook.” Allfacebook Report.  November 2011. Web. Accessed December 5, 2012.
<http://allfacebook.com/facebook-small-business-4_b66989>

Goldwert, Lindsay. “Facebook Named in a Third of Divorce Filings in 2011.” New York Daily News.  May 24, 2012. Web. Accessed December 10, 2011.
<http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-05-24/news/31842342_1_divorce-filings-facebook-divorce-online>

Hinduja, Sameer and Justin Patchin. “Cyberbullying: Identification, Prevention, and Response.” Cyberbullyting Research Center. November 2012. Web. Accessed November 29, 2012.
<http://www.cyberbullying.us/Cyberbullying_Identification_Prevention_Response_Fact_Sheet.pdf>

Paulson, Amanda. “Schools Weigh Risk, Benefit of Facebook.” Christian Science Monitor. September 27, 2011.  Web.  Accessed November 29, 2012.

Pittman, David. “Facebook and Twitter May Help Fight Obesity in Kids.” ABC News. On Call and Wellness Center, December 7, 2012. Web. Accessed December 8, 2012. <http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Wellness/facebook-twitter-fight-obesity kids/story?id=17904358/>

Rochman, Bonnie. “Kids Who Use Facebook Do Worse in School.” Time. Health and Family. August 8, 2011. Web.  December 1, 2012.  <http://healthland.time.com/2011/08/08/kids-who-hang-out-on-facebook-do-worse-in-school/>

Rock the Vote. 2012. Web. Accessed December 4, 2012.
<http//www.rockthevote.com>

Walton, Alice. “The True Costs of Facebook Addiction: Low Self-Esteem and Poor Body Image.” Forbes. April 5, 2012. Web. Accessed November 29, 2012.
<http://www.forbes.com/sites/alicegwalton/2012/04/05/the-true-costs-of-facebook-addiction-low-self-esteem-and-poor-body-image/>

Friday, October 26, 2012

Social Networking Sites

Feeling chatty?  Want to join a conversation without using a telephone?  Well do we have a deal for you.  For the price of an internet connection, you can join a conversation, catch up with your buddies, and share an idea with millions of people using the power of social networking! "Wow!" you ask, "Where do I sign up!" Right this way...

Nope just a little to the left. Bright rectangular button. Yup. 

Congratulations. You are now viewing Myspace, the Ghost of Social Networking Sites past and one of the first to gain national recognition.  Created in 2003 by former employees of Friendster and eUniverse, Myspace offered a way for users to not just communicate but design their own respective places on the web.  In addition to typing, participants could express themselves using graphics, photos, and color.  The HTML code responsible was both found via the site or external internet sources.  Sounds great, right?  Depends on whom you ask.  The result sometimes looked a little...ambitious.  Expressions of artistic freedom often resulted in excess of glowing unicorns, dancing leprechauns, and lovely wolves covered in glitter.  Further,  pages often borrowed from one another in appearance and tone and so every "unique" page began to appear alike.  Still, users could share thoughts, devise playlists, and choose their mood with little or no programming knowledge.  Quiet in here, isn't it? Myspace began it's eventual decline in 2006.  Some might cite ease of phishing scams, spyware, or general hacking.  Others would say that Myspace too heavily centered on music and entertainment.  I recall the death knell - new legal regulations meant users could no longer engage in commerce using their Myspace pages and many small businesses closed or moved elsewhere.  Alas, the damage was done, and many left for greener pastures. 

Around 2008, the exodus began toward a more formal and restrained interface.  A Compete.com study reveals that Facebook gained the most active users just as Myspace dropped rock bottom in popularity.  Maybe the lack of choice was, in part, the attraction.  The page was blue and white, and there wasn't anything you could do about it.    Like users of Myspace, participants can type out their thoughts and respond to those of their friends.  Privacy features and "friend request" options make for an open circuit.  Avatars ore uniformly placed in the upper left hand corner above more options.  There seems to be few freedoms however; buttons allow one to create a store (commerce), control playlists, and adapt news feeds.  One of the most distinguishing features of Facebook is its exclusivity.  Users can hide items, erase other's posts, and relegate friends to special lists (or block/unfriend them altogether).  Business thrive on Facebook regardless of the existence of a brick and mortar store.  Counting "likes" is now included in marketing plans of major corporations, many of whom use Facebook to advertise products and contests.  All these leave Myspace looking like a bedazzled homage to the not too distant past.        

This way now. More to see over here.

Welcome to Twitter, Facebook's simpler, more cozy sitting room.  Here you can also (surprise) share your ideas, hopes, dreams, whatever.   Twitter differs from other social networking sites in that entire communities can quickly build around a single subject. (Facebook can promote a "Lord of the Flies" atmosphere and Twitter seems more diplomatic).  Grown from the need to send unbroken SMS messages (which allow for 160 characters at a time), a Twitter message is entirely 140 characters long.  There is room on the page for a short bio, an avatar, and followers/followed Twitterers.   Similar to a blog,  you can type statements and reply to others with a simple RT.  You can share links and photos with ease.  The interface is easily digested in consecutive rectangles according to date and time.  Business can easily use twitter to support their Facebook marketing efforts and Twitter itself, like Facebook, uses an ad based business model.   

And so now we have my favorite, Ye Olde Mystery Network- Livejournal?  This was a place of pure expression in paragraph glory.  An online diary by every means,  users could write to their heart's content. In play were preferences, letters, poems, stories, even musical compositions.  Like a true blog, every entry had it's own page, complete with comments from friends, and each user had a front page listing recent entries and links to comment areas.  Avatars, biographies, personal philosophies all found a clear place.  There was the obligatory friend list and private/public sharing options.  Unfortunately for Livejournal users, the free site eventually opted for a tired pricing plan instead of advertiser supported options.  Recently the service closed operations locally and moved to Russia; RIP Livejournal 1999-2009.  This concludes our tour; the balcony is now closed.     

Monday, October 22, 2012

The hidden rules that shape human progress

BBC
In Depth | 18 October 2012

The hidden rules that shape human progress


Our lives are governed by centuries of advances that haven’t been random, as mathematician and network scientist Samuel Arbesman argues there’s a pattern that reveals how our knowledge has changed over time.
I had my first experience with the internet in the early 1990s. I activated our 300-baud modem, allowed it to begin its R2-D2-like hissing and whistling, and began to telnet. A window on our Macintosh’s screen began filling with text and announced our connection to the computers at the local university. After exploring a series of text menus, I began my first download: a text document containing Plato’s The Republic, via Project Gutenberg. After what felt like a significant fraction of an hour, I was ecstatic. I can distinctly remember jumping up and down, celebrating that I had this entire book on our computer using nothing but phone lines and a lot of atonal beeping.

It took me almost a decade to actually get around to reading The Republic. By the time I did, the notion that I expressed wonder at such a mundane activity as downloading a text document seemed quaint. In 2012, people stream movies onto their computers nightly without praising the modem gods. We have gone from the days of early web pages, with their garish backgrounds and blinking text, to slick interactive sites with enough bells and whistles to make the entire experience smooth and multimedia based. No one thinks any longer about modems or the details of bandwidth speeds. And certainly no one uses the word baud anymore.

The changes haven’t ended there. To store data, I have used floppy disks, diskettes, zip discs, rewritable CDs, flash drives, burnable DVDs, even the Commodore Datasette. Now, I save many of my documents to storage that’s available anytime I have access to the internet: the cloud.
The technological revolution we’re currently experiencing is not a one-off, technology has been changing over the centuries. But what’s surprising is that if you look below the surface you discover that this progress is not random or erratic, it almost always follows a pattern. And understanding this pattern helps us to appreciate far more than faster download speeds or improved data storage. It helps us to understand something fundamental to our success as a species. It helps us to understand how our knowledge changes and evolves.

Double up

In technology, the best-known example of this pattern is Moore’s Law, which states that the processing power of a single chip or circuit will double every year. Gordon Moore, a retired chemist and physicist as well as the co-creator of the Intel Corporation, wasn’t famous or fabulously wealthy when he developed his law. In fact, he hadn’t even founded Intel yet.
In 1965, Moore wrote a short paper, entitled Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits, where he predicted the number of possible components placed on a single circuit for a fixed cost would double every year. He didn’t arrive at this conclusion through exhaustive amounts of data gathering and analysis; in fact, he based his law on only four data points.
The incredible thing is that he was right. This law has held roughly true since 1965; it has weathered the personal computer revolution, the march of processors from 286 to 486 to Pentium, and the many advances since then. While further data has shown that the period for doubling is closer to eighteen months than a year, the principle stands. Processing power grows every year at a constant rate rather than by a constant amount. And according to the original formulation, the annual rate of growth is about 200%.
But when processing power doubles rapidly it allows much more to be possible, and therefore many other developments occur as a result. For example, the number of pixels that digital cameras can process has increased directly due to the regularity of Moore’s Law. This ongoing doubling of technological capabilities has even reached the world of robots. Rodney Brooks, a professor at MIT and a pioneer in the field, found that how far and how fast a robot can move goes through a doubling about every two years: right on schedule and similar to Moore’s Law.

More: http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20121018-hidden-rules-of-human-progress

Friday, October 19, 2012

Social Networking

Social media is an effective tool for communicating within our society like never before.  It's easier than ever to be hired, fired, then cry about it over a chat with friends without ever meeting in person.  According to NPR, Linkedin alone has about 130,000 recruiters.  We can trade everything from love letters to state secrets without using envelopes.  We can vote to name a tree in Yellowstone forest or marry a dolphin (not kidding). Learning about political candidates become a hobby for laypeople (NY Times). People can seek out support groups to ease their troubles and share medical symptoms (could be scary however; always consult a professional when considering any of the above).

It would be great to say that all these have saved ridiculous amounts of paper however recent signs of climate change dispute this.  Instead social media has made for new industries and business models. Online marketing is now a growing field that often uses a pay per click model.  Anyone can start a small business online with help from Facebook and Twitter.  This has put the means of production back into individual homes; lucky ones with the right idea can build an empire without leaving the sofa. Also, we're using social media to conduct this very online course, enabling students to matriculate on time or graduate at all (thank you sincerely for offering BUSN3110 NET1).  Social media however does contain a dark side.  Cultural narcissism, at least here in America, quickly comes to mind.  We love to read up on friend's updates in order to keep in touch yet error occurs when we assume everyone really cares about every detail.  Further, bullying and harassment can drive vulnerable people over the edge (JuicyCampus? Really?? Ugh). Other drawbacks are stalking, impersonation, ruined reputations, and, heaven forbid, blackouts that threaten a backward slide to feudal times.  (A documentary about college students going sans internet for one harrowing month was pretty enlightening).  Lastly, platforms such as Myspace and Facebook, while uniting in nature, can isolate individuals, becoming a substitute for genuine and arguably beneficial human interaction.  With these criticisms in mind, social media can remain a positive tool for change if users can maintain perspective, embrace critical thinking, and exhibit self control.  

So, where is all this going?  Under the current circumstances, social media may not change or grow at all.  Technologies tend to emerge one size fits most (DVD players, television, radio), then fragment into specialized uses offered by many different brands.  There may come various incarnations of Facebook or Twitter with individualized features (or, maybe not because this is how these platforms actually began before they became on general interface. The historical pattern in reverse). I'd like to think that social media serves people and so platforms would evolve in ways that contribute to better user experience or purpose.  The reverse however currently seems to be true; users become enslaved by the need to establish and maintain an image, and businesses are keenly aware of this.  In truth it's clear that people voluntarily sacrifice individual liberties (privacy, integrity, personal safety) in exchange for the privilege to contribute anywhere, anytime.  The result is, as expected, big profits for media companies at the cost of the individual.  And where has this ever gotten us in terms of societal benefit?  Certainly not better customer service.  As with most service based business models, social media may stagnate if users continue to believe in the illusory "power to the people" element of instant communication.  It will be interesting to see what, if anything, moves us into more forward thinking territory.