Monday, October 29, 2012

Bibliography


Work Cited

Cohen, David. “96% of Small Businesses Are on Facebook.” Allfacebook Report.  November 2011. Web. Accessed December 5, 2012.
<http://allfacebook.com/facebook-small-business-4_b66989>

Goldwert, Lindsay. “Facebook Named in a Third of Divorce Filings in 2011.” New York Daily News.  May 24, 2012. Web. Accessed December 10, 2011.
<http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-05-24/news/31842342_1_divorce-filings-facebook-divorce-online>

Hinduja, Sameer and Justin Patchin. “Cyberbullying: Identification, Prevention, and Response.” Cyberbullyting Research Center. November 2012. Web. Accessed November 29, 2012.
<http://www.cyberbullying.us/Cyberbullying_Identification_Prevention_Response_Fact_Sheet.pdf>

Paulson, Amanda. “Schools Weigh Risk, Benefit of Facebook.” Christian Science Monitor. September 27, 2011.  Web.  Accessed November 29, 2012.

Pittman, David. “Facebook and Twitter May Help Fight Obesity in Kids.” ABC News. On Call and Wellness Center, December 7, 2012. Web. Accessed December 8, 2012. <http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Wellness/facebook-twitter-fight-obesity kids/story?id=17904358/>

Rochman, Bonnie. “Kids Who Use Facebook Do Worse in School.” Time. Health and Family. August 8, 2011. Web.  December 1, 2012.  <http://healthland.time.com/2011/08/08/kids-who-hang-out-on-facebook-do-worse-in-school/>

Rock the Vote. 2012. Web. Accessed December 4, 2012.
<http//www.rockthevote.com>

Walton, Alice. “The True Costs of Facebook Addiction: Low Self-Esteem and Poor Body Image.” Forbes. April 5, 2012. Web. Accessed November 29, 2012.
<http://www.forbes.com/sites/alicegwalton/2012/04/05/the-true-costs-of-facebook-addiction-low-self-esteem-and-poor-body-image/>

Friday, October 26, 2012

Social Networking Sites

Feeling chatty?  Want to join a conversation without using a telephone?  Well do we have a deal for you.  For the price of an internet connection, you can join a conversation, catch up with your buddies, and share an idea with millions of people using the power of social networking! "Wow!" you ask, "Where do I sign up!" Right this way...

Nope just a little to the left. Bright rectangular button. Yup. 

Congratulations. You are now viewing Myspace, the Ghost of Social Networking Sites past and one of the first to gain national recognition.  Created in 2003 by former employees of Friendster and eUniverse, Myspace offered a way for users to not just communicate but design their own respective places on the web.  In addition to typing, participants could express themselves using graphics, photos, and color.  The HTML code responsible was both found via the site or external internet sources.  Sounds great, right?  Depends on whom you ask.  The result sometimes looked a little...ambitious.  Expressions of artistic freedom often resulted in excess of glowing unicorns, dancing leprechauns, and lovely wolves covered in glitter.  Further,  pages often borrowed from one another in appearance and tone and so every "unique" page began to appear alike.  Still, users could share thoughts, devise playlists, and choose their mood with little or no programming knowledge.  Quiet in here, isn't it? Myspace began it's eventual decline in 2006.  Some might cite ease of phishing scams, spyware, or general hacking.  Others would say that Myspace too heavily centered on music and entertainment.  I recall the death knell - new legal regulations meant users could no longer engage in commerce using their Myspace pages and many small businesses closed or moved elsewhere.  Alas, the damage was done, and many left for greener pastures. 

Around 2008, the exodus began toward a more formal and restrained interface.  A Compete.com study reveals that Facebook gained the most active users just as Myspace dropped rock bottom in popularity.  Maybe the lack of choice was, in part, the attraction.  The page was blue and white, and there wasn't anything you could do about it.    Like users of Myspace, participants can type out their thoughts and respond to those of their friends.  Privacy features and "friend request" options make for an open circuit.  Avatars ore uniformly placed in the upper left hand corner above more options.  There seems to be few freedoms however; buttons allow one to create a store (commerce), control playlists, and adapt news feeds.  One of the most distinguishing features of Facebook is its exclusivity.  Users can hide items, erase other's posts, and relegate friends to special lists (or block/unfriend them altogether).  Business thrive on Facebook regardless of the existence of a brick and mortar store.  Counting "likes" is now included in marketing plans of major corporations, many of whom use Facebook to advertise products and contests.  All these leave Myspace looking like a bedazzled homage to the not too distant past.        

This way now. More to see over here.

Welcome to Twitter, Facebook's simpler, more cozy sitting room.  Here you can also (surprise) share your ideas, hopes, dreams, whatever.   Twitter differs from other social networking sites in that entire communities can quickly build around a single subject. (Facebook can promote a "Lord of the Flies" atmosphere and Twitter seems more diplomatic).  Grown from the need to send unbroken SMS messages (which allow for 160 characters at a time), a Twitter message is entirely 140 characters long.  There is room on the page for a short bio, an avatar, and followers/followed Twitterers.   Similar to a blog,  you can type statements and reply to others with a simple RT.  You can share links and photos with ease.  The interface is easily digested in consecutive rectangles according to date and time.  Business can easily use twitter to support their Facebook marketing efforts and Twitter itself, like Facebook, uses an ad based business model.   

And so now we have my favorite, Ye Olde Mystery Network- Livejournal?  This was a place of pure expression in paragraph glory.  An online diary by every means,  users could write to their heart's content. In play were preferences, letters, poems, stories, even musical compositions.  Like a true blog, every entry had it's own page, complete with comments from friends, and each user had a front page listing recent entries and links to comment areas.  Avatars, biographies, personal philosophies all found a clear place.  There was the obligatory friend list and private/public sharing options.  Unfortunately for Livejournal users, the free site eventually opted for a tired pricing plan instead of advertiser supported options.  Recently the service closed operations locally and moved to Russia; RIP Livejournal 1999-2009.  This concludes our tour; the balcony is now closed.     

Monday, October 22, 2012

The hidden rules that shape human progress

BBC
In Depth | 18 October 2012

The hidden rules that shape human progress


Our lives are governed by centuries of advances that haven’t been random, as mathematician and network scientist Samuel Arbesman argues there’s a pattern that reveals how our knowledge has changed over time.
I had my first experience with the internet in the early 1990s. I activated our 300-baud modem, allowed it to begin its R2-D2-like hissing and whistling, and began to telnet. A window on our Macintosh’s screen began filling with text and announced our connection to the computers at the local university. After exploring a series of text menus, I began my first download: a text document containing Plato’s The Republic, via Project Gutenberg. After what felt like a significant fraction of an hour, I was ecstatic. I can distinctly remember jumping up and down, celebrating that I had this entire book on our computer using nothing but phone lines and a lot of atonal beeping.

It took me almost a decade to actually get around to reading The Republic. By the time I did, the notion that I expressed wonder at such a mundane activity as downloading a text document seemed quaint. In 2012, people stream movies onto their computers nightly without praising the modem gods. We have gone from the days of early web pages, with their garish backgrounds and blinking text, to slick interactive sites with enough bells and whistles to make the entire experience smooth and multimedia based. No one thinks any longer about modems or the details of bandwidth speeds. And certainly no one uses the word baud anymore.

The changes haven’t ended there. To store data, I have used floppy disks, diskettes, zip discs, rewritable CDs, flash drives, burnable DVDs, even the Commodore Datasette. Now, I save many of my documents to storage that’s available anytime I have access to the internet: the cloud.
The technological revolution we’re currently experiencing is not a one-off, technology has been changing over the centuries. But what’s surprising is that if you look below the surface you discover that this progress is not random or erratic, it almost always follows a pattern. And understanding this pattern helps us to appreciate far more than faster download speeds or improved data storage. It helps us to understand something fundamental to our success as a species. It helps us to understand how our knowledge changes and evolves.

Double up

In technology, the best-known example of this pattern is Moore’s Law, which states that the processing power of a single chip or circuit will double every year. Gordon Moore, a retired chemist and physicist as well as the co-creator of the Intel Corporation, wasn’t famous or fabulously wealthy when he developed his law. In fact, he hadn’t even founded Intel yet.
In 1965, Moore wrote a short paper, entitled Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits, where he predicted the number of possible components placed on a single circuit for a fixed cost would double every year. He didn’t arrive at this conclusion through exhaustive amounts of data gathering and analysis; in fact, he based his law on only four data points.
The incredible thing is that he was right. This law has held roughly true since 1965; it has weathered the personal computer revolution, the march of processors from 286 to 486 to Pentium, and the many advances since then. While further data has shown that the period for doubling is closer to eighteen months than a year, the principle stands. Processing power grows every year at a constant rate rather than by a constant amount. And according to the original formulation, the annual rate of growth is about 200%.
But when processing power doubles rapidly it allows much more to be possible, and therefore many other developments occur as a result. For example, the number of pixels that digital cameras can process has increased directly due to the regularity of Moore’s Law. This ongoing doubling of technological capabilities has even reached the world of robots. Rodney Brooks, a professor at MIT and a pioneer in the field, found that how far and how fast a robot can move goes through a doubling about every two years: right on schedule and similar to Moore’s Law.

More: http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20121018-hidden-rules-of-human-progress

Friday, October 19, 2012

Social Networking

Social media is an effective tool for communicating within our society like never before.  It's easier than ever to be hired, fired, then cry about it over a chat with friends without ever meeting in person.  According to NPR, Linkedin alone has about 130,000 recruiters.  We can trade everything from love letters to state secrets without using envelopes.  We can vote to name a tree in Yellowstone forest or marry a dolphin (not kidding). Learning about political candidates become a hobby for laypeople (NY Times). People can seek out support groups to ease their troubles and share medical symptoms (could be scary however; always consult a professional when considering any of the above).

It would be great to say that all these have saved ridiculous amounts of paper however recent signs of climate change dispute this.  Instead social media has made for new industries and business models. Online marketing is now a growing field that often uses a pay per click model.  Anyone can start a small business online with help from Facebook and Twitter.  This has put the means of production back into individual homes; lucky ones with the right idea can build an empire without leaving the sofa. Also, we're using social media to conduct this very online course, enabling students to matriculate on time or graduate at all (thank you sincerely for offering BUSN3110 NET1).  Social media however does contain a dark side.  Cultural narcissism, at least here in America, quickly comes to mind.  We love to read up on friend's updates in order to keep in touch yet error occurs when we assume everyone really cares about every detail.  Further, bullying and harassment can drive vulnerable people over the edge (JuicyCampus? Really?? Ugh). Other drawbacks are stalking, impersonation, ruined reputations, and, heaven forbid, blackouts that threaten a backward slide to feudal times.  (A documentary about college students going sans internet for one harrowing month was pretty enlightening).  Lastly, platforms such as Myspace and Facebook, while uniting in nature, can isolate individuals, becoming a substitute for genuine and arguably beneficial human interaction.  With these criticisms in mind, social media can remain a positive tool for change if users can maintain perspective, embrace critical thinking, and exhibit self control.  

So, where is all this going?  Under the current circumstances, social media may not change or grow at all.  Technologies tend to emerge one size fits most (DVD players, television, radio), then fragment into specialized uses offered by many different brands.  There may come various incarnations of Facebook or Twitter with individualized features (or, maybe not because this is how these platforms actually began before they became on general interface. The historical pattern in reverse). I'd like to think that social media serves people and so platforms would evolve in ways that contribute to better user experience or purpose.  The reverse however currently seems to be true; users become enslaved by the need to establish and maintain an image, and businesses are keenly aware of this.  In truth it's clear that people voluntarily sacrifice individual liberties (privacy, integrity, personal safety) in exchange for the privilege to contribute anywhere, anytime.  The result is, as expected, big profits for media companies at the cost of the individual.  And where has this ever gotten us in terms of societal benefit?  Certainly not better customer service.  As with most service based business models, social media may stagnate if users continue to believe in the illusory "power to the people" element of instant communication.  It will be interesting to see what, if anything, moves us into more forward thinking territory.